Triathlon is a sport of multifaceted demands, requiring not only exceptional aerobic capacity and endurance over prolonged periods but also bursts of power, sustained force application, and robust musculoskeletal resilience. For many years, traditional triathlon training largely focused on accumulating significant volume in swimming, cycling, and running, often with skepticism towards incorporating strength or resistance training. The concern was the “interference phenomenon,” the idea that simultaneous endurance and strength training could blunt the adaptations from one or both modalities, preventing the athlete from reaching their full potential. However, a substantial and growing body of scientific research has provided a more nuanced understanding of concurrent training – the practice of performing both endurance and strength training within the same training period. This research reveals that while potential interference exists, strategically integrating strength training can offer significant benefits for triathletes, improving performance, enhancing fatigue resistance, and crucially, reducing the risk of common injuries. For the modern triathlete seeking a holistic approach to performance, concurrent training is not a detractor but a powerful, evidence-backed necessity. This article will explore the science of concurrent training, addressing the interference effect and outlining strategies for triathletes to effectively combine strength and endurance work to achieve optimal outcomes.
Concurrent training simply refers to the programming of both endurance (e.g., swimming, cycling, running) and resistance (strength) training within a single microcycle (week) or macrocycle (training year). The potential conflict arises because these two types of exercise training stimulate different physiological pathways and adaptations. Endurance training primarily enhances aerobic capacity, mitochondrial function, and cardiovascular efficiency, while resistance training focuses on increasing muscle mass, strength, and power¹. The cellular signals triggered by endurance exercise (such as the activation of AMPK) can, in some circumstances, inhibit the signaling pathways crucial for muscle protein synthesis and hypertrophy stimulated by resistance training (such as the mTOR pathway)² This molecular “cross-talk” is a key mechanism behind the interference phenomenon. Additionally, performing both types of training can lead to greater overall fatigue, potentially impairing the quality of subsequent training sessions, regardless of modality, and increasing the time required for recovery³. Depletion of energy stores (like muscle glycogen) from endurance exercise can also limit the capacity for high-quality strength work performed shortly thereafter⁴.
Despite this potential for interference, the research is compelling regarding the benefits of strength training for endurance performance. Far from hindering endurance gains, appropriately designed strength training can actively contribute to faster times and improved efficiency in endurance events. A key benefit highlighted by numerous studies is improved exercise economy – the energy cost of moving at a given speed or power output⁵. For runners, strength training, particularly heavy resistance training and plyometrics, has been shown to improve running economy, meaning the athlete uses less oxygen to run at the same pace⁶. This is attributed to factors such as increased muscle stiffness, improved neuromuscular coordination, and better utilization of elastic energy. Similarly, strength training can enhance cycling economy and power output by improving force production capacity and neuromuscular efficiency, allowing cyclists to produce more power relative to their body weight or improve their ability to sustain a higher percentage of their VO2max⁷. While less studied than running and cycling, strength training can also contribute to improved power in the swim, particularly in upper body and core strength relevant to stroke mechanics⁸.
Beyond economy, strength training has been shown to improve lactate threshold indirectly by allowing the athlete to perform at a higher absolute speed or power output for the same relative physiological cost. It also enhances fatigue resistance, particularly in the later stages of prolonged exercise, by improving the capacity of the muscles to generate force repeatedly⁹. This is crucial for maintaining form and pace during the challenging final portions of a triathlon.
Crucially, strength training plays a vital role in injury prevention, a major concern for triathletes who subject their bodies to repetitive stress across three disciplines¹⁰. Strength training helps address muscle imbalances common in endurance athletes, strengthens connective tissues (tendons and ligaments), and improves the resilience of muscles and joints to the demands of training and racing¹¹. A stronger musculoskeletal system is better equipped to absorb impact forces during running, maintain optimal position on the bike, and generate force efficiently in the water, reducing the likelihood of overuse injuries such as tendinopathies, stress fractures, and lower back pain¹².
Given the clear benefits and the potential for interference, the science of concurrent training has focused heavily on finding strategies to maximize gains from both modalities while minimizing negative interactions. One of the most critical factors is the timing of endurance and strength sessions. Research consistently shows that performing these sessions with sufficient recovery time between them is key to minimizing interference¹³. Ideally, endurance and strength training should be done on separate days. If this is not possible, separating the sessions by at least 6-8 hours allows for some recovery and replenishment of energy stores, and importantly, allows the molecular signaling pathways triggered by each type of exercise to operate relatively independently¹⁴. The order of sessions on the same day can also matter, with some evidence suggesting that performing strength training after endurance training may slightly blunt strength adaptations more than the reverse, although this is less clear-cut and can depend on the intensity and duration of both sessions¹⁵. Prioritizing the most important session of the day (e.g., a key high-intensity bike interval session) by performing it when freshest is often a practical approach.
The intensity and volume of the strength training itself are also crucial considerations for triathletes. The goal for most triathletes is not maximal muscle hypertrophy but rather increased strength, power, and muscular endurance relevant to their sport. Research indicates that focusing on heavy resistance training with relatively low repetitions (e.g., 3-6 repetitions per set) is effective for improving strength and neuromuscular function with less associated muscle soreness and fatigue compared to higher volume, moderate intensity training often used for bodybuilding¹⁶. Avoiding excessive eccentric loading, particularly in exercises like squats and lunges, during peak endurance training phases can also help manage muscle damage and soreness¹⁷.
Periodization is fundamental to successful concurrent training in triathlon. The emphasis on strength training should typically be higher during the off-season or base phases of training, where the overall endurance volume and intensity are lower¹⁸. This allows the athlete to build a solid foundation of strength. As the race season approaches and endurance volume and intensity increase, the focus of strength training shifts to maintenance, with reduced frequency (e.g., 1-2 sessions per week) and potentially lighter loads or more sport-specific power-focused exercises¹⁹. This ensures that strength gains are preserved without adding excessive fatigue that could compromise key endurance sessions.
Finally, nutrition and recovery become even more critical when undertaking concurrent training²⁰. Adequate protein intake, particularly distributed throughout the day and around training sessions, is essential to support muscle repair and synthesis stimulated by both strength and endurance work²¹. Sufficient carbohydrate intake is necessary to fuel both types of demanding sessions and replenish glycogen stores, which are heavily utilized during endurance exercise and are needed for high-intensity strength efforts²². Prioritizing sleep and incorporating other recovery strategies like proper hydration, active recovery, and potentially massage or foam rolling are vital to manage the increased training load and facilitate adaptation²³.
Translating these principles into practice for triathletes means integrating 1-3 strength training sessions per week, depending on the training phase and the athlete’s capacity. These sessions should focus on compound movements that work multiple muscle groups relevant to swimming, cycling, and running, such as squats, deadlifts (with careful technique), lunges, rows, pull-ups, and presses²⁴. Core strength exercises are also paramount for stability and power transfer across all three disciplines²⁵. Scheduling these sessions strategically, ideally on days separate from the hardest endurance workouts or with significant time separation, is key. For example, a triathlete might do a hard bike interval session on Tuesday and their primary strength session on Wednesday, or an easy swim in the morning followed by a strength session in the late afternoon on the same day.
In conclusion, while the physiological interference phenomenon between endurance and strength training is a real consideration, the overwhelming evidence supports the inclusion of concurrent training for triathletes. The benefits in terms of improved exercise economy, enhanced fatigue resistance, and significant injury prevention far outweigh the potential drawbacks when concurrent training is implemented strategically. By paying close attention to the timing and separation of sessions, the type and volume of strength training, and by prioritizing recovery and nutrition, triathletes can effectively integrate strength work into their demanding schedules. Concurrent training, guided by scientific research and individualized planning, is a powerful tool for triathletes looking to build a more robust, efficient, and resilient body capable of achieving peak performance across swim, bike, and run. It represents a modern, evidence-based approach to maximizing potential in the challenging and rewarding sport of triathlon.
¹ Fyfe, J. J., Bishop, D. J., & Stepto, N. K. (2014). Interference between concurrent resistance and endurance exercise: molecular bases and the role1 of exercise intensity and volume. Sports Medicine, 44(6), 743-762.
² Baar, K. (2014). Using molecular biology to maximize concurrent training. Sports Medicine, 44(Suppl 2), S117-S125.
³ Fyfe, J. J., Bishop, D. J., & Stepto, N. K. (2014). Interference between concurrent resistance and endurance exercise: molecular bases and the role2 of exercise intensity and volume. Sports Medicine, 44(6), 743-762.
⁴ Hawley, J. A. (2009). Molecular responses to strength and endurance training: parallels and contrasts. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 107(5), 487-496.
⁵ Rønnestad, B. R., & Mujika, I. (2014). Optimizing strength training for running and cycling endurance performance: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(4),3 603-612.
⁶ Blagrove, R. C., Howatson, G., & Hayes, P. R. (2018). Effects of strength training on the physiological determinants of middle-and long-distance running performance: a systematic4 review. Sports Medicine, 48(5),5 1117-1143.
⁷ Rønnestad, B. R., Hansen, J., Raastad, T., & Hallén, J. (2010). Strength training improves cycling performance, peak power output, and lactate threshold in well-trained cyclists. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 108(5), 941-949.
⁸ Aspenes, S. T., Kjendlie, P. L., Hoff, J., & Helgerud, J. (2009). Combined strength and endurance training in competitive swimmers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(8), 2283-2296.
⁹ Rønnestad, B. R., & Mujika, I. (2014). Optimizing strength training for running and cycling endurance performance: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(4),6 603-612.
¹⁰ Gosling, C. M., Gabbe, B. J., Finch, C. F., Orchard, J. W., & Wajswelner, H. (2008). A survey of triathlon-related injuries. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(9), 1760-1766.
¹¹ Lauersen, J. B., Bertelsen, D. M., & Andersen, L. B. (2014). The effect of exercise interventions on the prevention of sports injuries: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(11), 871-877.
¹² Rønnestad, B. R., & Mujika, I. (2014). Optimizing strength training for running and cycling endurance performance: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(4),7 603-612.
¹³ Robineau, J., Babault, N., Piscione, J., Lacome, M., & Saidi, H. (2016). Specific aspects of concurrent training in endurance sports: review and practical recommendations. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 41(12), 1279-1291.
¹⁴ Fyfe, J. J., Bishop, D. J., & Stepto, N. K. (2014). Interference between concurrent resistance and endurance exercise: molecular bases and the role8 of exercise intensity and volume. Sports Medicine, 44(6), 743-762.
¹⁵ Robineau, J., Babault, N., Piscione, J., Lacome, M., & Saidi, H. (2016). Specific aspects of concurrent training in endurance sports: review and practical recommendations. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 41(12), 1279-1291.
¹⁶ Rønnestad, B. R., & Mujika, I. (2014). Optimizing strength training for running and cycling endurance performance: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(4),9 603-612.
¹⁷ Berryman, N., Maurel, D., & Bosquet, L. (2018). Concurrent training for sprint performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 48(8), 1939-1952. (Highlights eccentric exercise considerations).
¹⁸ Kiely, J. (2018). Periodization paradigms in the 21st century: Evidence-based recommendations for coaches and athletes. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 13(3), 309-319.
¹⁹ Rønnestad, B. R., & Mujika, I. (2014). Optimizing strength training for running and cycling endurance performance: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(4),10 603-612.
²⁰ Hawley, J. A., Burke, L. M., Phillips, S. M., Gordon, S. E., Morton, J. P., & Coffey, V. G. (2011). Training and nutrition for the enhancement of endurance performance. European Journal of Sport Science, 11(1), 1-10.
²¹ Phillips, S. M., & Van Loon, L. J. C. (2011). Dietary protein for athletes: from requirements to optimum adaptation. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(sup1), S29-S38.11
²² Burke, L. M., Hawley, J. A., Wong, S. H., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2011). Carbohydrates for training and competition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(sup1), S17-S27.12
²³ Halson, S. L. (2014). Sleep in and around exercise. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 9(2), 201-204.
²⁴ Rønnestad, B. R., & Mujika, I. (2014). Optimizing strength training for running and cycling endurance performance: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(4),13 603-612.
²⁵ Hibbs, A. E., Thompson, K. G., French, D. N., Wrigley, A., & Spears, I. R. (2008). Optimizing performance by improving core stability and core strength. Sports Medicine, 38(12), 995-1008.